<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rails: url vs path</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.7deeds.com/2009/09/21/rails-url-vs-path/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.7deeds.com/2009/09/21/rails-url-vs-path/</link>
	<description>Petros Amiridis - A humble programmer's seven noteworthy actions for the community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:32:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Difference of *_path and *_url in Rails routing &#171; Information Overflow</title>
		<link>http://blog.7deeds.com/2009/09/21/rails-url-vs-path/comment-page-1/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Difference of *_path and *_url in Rails routing &#171; Information Overflow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.7deeds.com/?p=331#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>[...] question too when I started coding in Rails. Finally, I have found the answer while reading this post. *_path are for views because ahrefs are implicitly linked to the current URL. So it’d be a waste [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] question too when I started coding in Rails. Finally, I have found the answer while reading this post. *_path are for views because ahrefs are implicitly linked to the current URL. So it’d be a waste [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
